Privacy a Consideration in Divorce

free essay breast cancer follow link how to write a personal statement for a job descriptive beach essay example essay on latest computer technology low cost generic generic cialis pills stories essay cialis decatur city sample essay describing oneself go to link viagra commercial blues tune clomid testicular size undergraduate thesis u of t using poppers viagra science development in india essay get link huck finn controversy essay ginseng el viagra natural go site go to link assigment go to link las verdades del viagra how do i turn on voicemail transcription on iphone 6 life in college essay annotated literature review clean india hindi essay on my mother I just read that movie director Cameron Crowe and his wife, Nancy Wilson recently divorced using the collaborative law process. Cameron and Wilson, a member of the rock band Heart, must have been attracted by the prospect of working out the terms of their divorce in private and away from the prying eyes of the paparazzi. They agreed on joint custody of their twin sons, who were also shielded from the prospect of their parent’s differences being public fodder.

I have found it to be true that, for my clients who are public figures, privacy is one of the main features that attracted them to collaborative law. All collaborative law meetings are held in the privacy of the attorneys’ offices, at times that are convenient for everyone, and the final agreements are not filed in the public records of the court but maintained as private contracts between the parties. The only losers in this arrangement may be the readers of USA Today and People magazine — certainly not the divorcing couples.